Emerging Protectionism in Emerging Markets?

 

One of the primary factors that changed a recession into the Depression of the 1930s, was protectionist legislation enacted in the United States. This set off retaliatory moves by other nations that led to catastrophic reductions in global trade. Ultimately, protectionism combined with increased taxation, pushed the World into Depression as well prolonged it until trade revived during World War II.

As the World muddles through a global recession today, it is worth reminding ourselves of the mistakes made in the past. The article below, from www.businessneweurope.eu , clearly demonstrates that the lessons of the past have not been heeded by some of the World’s leaders.

The instinct to protect domestic manufacturers and farmers can be comprehended. However well intentioned this move is by Vladimir Putin, it will be counter-productive for growth in the Russian economy. Moreover, it will punish Russian consumers with higher prices, while stifling investment necessary for Russian companies to grow and compete.

Another more insidious effect of this protectionism will most certainly be similar moves by Russia’s trading partners. It may also set off a chain reaction of protectionist legislation in China and other emerging markets that could damage the Global Economy even further and deeper than anyone can imagine.

 

Russia reacts to recession with protectionism

 
Ben Aris in Berlin 
December 15, 2008
 

Russia officially went into recession on December 12, the day after the government announced a range of protectionist measures designed to shelter Russia’s strategically important agricultural sector from the worsening economic situation. 

Deputy Minister of Economic Development Andrei Klepach said that a recession has started in Russia, which may last more than two quarters, and that the country’s real GDP growth is unlikely to reach the government target of 6.8% in 2008. Growth had already fallen to 6.4% by the end of the third quarter of this year and banks like VTB Capital have cut their end-of-year forecast to 6.4%. 

Russia is following most of the world’s economies into recession. Moody’s Investors Service said in a report released earlier in December that, “global economic stagnation following the current disruptions in international financial markets is the most likely scenario for 2009 and 2010.” But Russia remains better placed than many other countries to weather the storm, thanks to its large currency reserves; Moody’s also confirmed Russia’s outlook as stable on Friday, though Standard & Poor’s downgraded the sovereign rating in December with a negative outlook. 

However, there remains great deal of uncertainty over what will happen next year. Everything depends on where oil prices settle and how well the government manages a controlled devaluation of the ruble over the next few months. “Next year’s GDP growth could range from negative 5% to plus 5%, depending on what happens to oil prices and the steps taken by the Russian government,” says Yevgeny Gavrilenkov, chief economist at Troika Dialog. 

While many pundits have speculated that oil will settle at between $60 and $70 a barrel in 2009 following production cuts by Opec and Russia, this is starting to look like the optimistic scenario: Goldman Sachs reckons oil prices will be dragged down by a collapse in global economic activity to $30 next year. 

Putting up barricades 

Clearly, next year is going to be tough and the Kremlin has already moved to protect some of its most vulnerable sectors. 

Despite a bumper harvest this year that netted over 103m tones of grain as of the start of December, Russia’s agricultural producers have been amongst the hardest hit by the crisis; farmers are heavily dependent on credit thanks to the seasonal nature of their job. 

Russian farmers have already seen profits fall by a third this year and will need to borrow a massive RUB860bn ($31bn) in 2009, Deputy Agriculture Minister Nikolai Arkhipov said December 11. As no government can afford to see food production fail, the Kremlin has already said it will cover any funding shortfalls. Currently, farmers already owe RUB1.2 trillion and can’t function without credit. 

To make sure Russian farms can find markets for their goods, the Kremlin cut poultry quotas on December 11 and hiked the duties on imports on pork imports above quota levels to 75% of the customs value. The duties for poultry were likewise raised to 95% for imports beyond the quota levels, which will hurt US producers particularly hard as Russia is a big market for them. 

At the same time, the Kremlin opened talks to source more foodstuff from Belarus, its tiny neighbour to the west, and offered other countries loans to finance exports of Russian grain to support prices for Russian producers. 

Food producers may be hurting, but the makers of agricultural equipment have seen their markets completely collapse. Prime Minister Vladimir Putin was on a tour of Rostselmash agrarian machine-building plant in Rostov-on-Don on December 11 and said it was, “working like a warehouse.” 

“In October, producers felt the impact of the global financial crisis. Payment capacity plummeted as banks reduced loans,” Putin was quoted by newswires as saying. “Sales of agricultural machinery in Russian regions virtually came to a standstill. We made a tour of the plant - it is overflowing [with machinery].” 

The Kremlin is clearly very concerned by the slowdown in the agricultural sector. The minister’s predictions that Russia will enjoy another bumper crop next year are being pooh-poohed by analysts who say that not only is the lack of snow this winter a problem, but they expect a lot of small farms will go bust in the spring; the Rostselmash factory has already sacked 1,000 employees more than the initial 300 it said were for the chop a month ago. 

The knee-jerk reaction has been to slap more duties on imported equipment to protect Russian producers. Putin proposed a temporary 15% customs duty on imports of agricultural equipment, although parts for machines already in Russia will be exempt. “I think that it is possible during the financial crisis to support domestic producers of agricultural equipment by raising customs duties on imports of new and used agricultural equipment for a period of nine months,” Putin said at a government meeting. 

Russia’s Industry and Trade Ministry says it could spend between RUB300m RUB500m next year to subsidize interest payments on loans of Russian agricultural equipment producers to upgrade their production facilities. The government will also give RUB25bn to Rosagroleasing, a state company that leases out agricultural equipment as ways to keep machine makers afloat. 

The protectionist barriers have been applied to agriculture first, but there are signs other sectors will also have walls built around them in the coming year. This summer, Russia became the largest car market in Europe, overtaking long-time champion Germany. However, the domestic producers are slowly losing their market share to imports; in December Russian government released details of new car import duties, which will come into effect in early January. 

“Prohibitive duties will be applied to vehicles more than five years old - the previous threshold was seven years. The duties for new cars (up to 3 years old) will increase 5% to 30%, while the duty for 3- to 5-year-old cars is set at 35% (up from 25% previously). At the same time, the government has significantly increased the minimum duty requirements – the minimum charge per cubic cm of engine volume,” say analysts at VTB Capital. 

 

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments (1)

Phil

March 30th, 2009 at 5:02 pm    


By Emma O’Brien

March 31 (Bloomberg) — Ukraine and Kazakhstan, home to two of this year’s worst emerging stock markets, are driving away investors by attempting to prevent capital flight.

Ukraine ordered banks this month to buy and sell the hryvnia at a rate no weaker than a floor policy makers set each day. Kazakhstan’s parliament is preparing to give the president power to force exporters to sell the government their foreign- currency earnings for tenge.

“If you’ve got money in a country that introduces some sort of controls, that’s an issue and so we’re steering pretty clear of that area right now,” said Andrew Bosomworth, a fund manager in Munich at Pacific Investment Management Co. who helps oversee more than $50 billion in emerging-market debt for the world’s largest bond-fund manager. “The best way to attract private money that’s going to stay there is to provide a coherent environment to invest in.”

The two nations devalued their currencies and took over struggling banks in the past six months as the first global recession since World War II slashed demand for exports at the same time that frozen credit markets drove away foreign investment.

Ukraine’s PFTS stock index fell 26 percent this year and the Kazakhstan Stock Exchange Shares Index lost 28 percent, ranking among the worst emerging-market performers with Costa Rica, Nigeria, Serbia, Qatar and Bosnia, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Slumping Currency

Ukraine’s foreign-currency reserves were reduced by a third in the six months to February, with most of that $12 billion drop due to the central bank’s purchases of hryvnia, said Ivan Tchakarov, an economist in London at Nomura Holdings Inc. The currency has slumped 37 percent versus the dollar since September as sales of steel, the nation’s biggest export, fell 50 percent in the year to February and the governing coalition collapsed over the handling of the economic crisis.

President Viktor Yushchenko, a former central bank governor who led the peaceful overthrow of a pro-Russian government in 2004, opposes Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko’s moves to fire current bank chief Volodymyr Stelmakh and to negotiate with Russia for a $5 billion loan.

Ukraine has received the first $4.5 billion installment of a $16.4 billion bailout from the International Monetary Fund. The IMF has delayed the second loan installment of $1.9 billion until the former Soviet state cuts a 2009 budget deficit equal to 5 percent of gross domestic product. The IMF will accept a budget gap of 3.1 percent of GDP, Yushchenko said March 23.

Minimum Rate

The central bank’s mandatory minimum hryvnia rate was 7.9489 per dollar when it was last updated on March 27. That’s 4 percent stronger than the 8.28 per dollar spot rate currency traders at Galt & Taggart Holdings Inc. saw quoted yesterday, said Nick Piazza, head of sales at the Kiev-based brokerage.

Countries like Ukraine and Kazakhstan need capital controls so they can stop hemorrhaging money, said Douglas Polunin, who manages about $200 million in emerging-market assets, including Ukrainian and Kazakh equities, at Polunin Capital Partners in London.

“They help the economy because you don’t have this sudden flow of money rushing out of the country that has such a destabilizing effect on company balance sheets,” Polunin said. “Overall capital controls are a good thing, though foreign investors do get frightened because of concerns they won’t be able to withdraw their money.”

Held Responsible

The central banks’ currency regulation department told lenders on March 17 that chairmen would be held responsible for the hryvnia exchange rates quoted on their bank Web sites and on information systems such as Bloomberg and Reuters, according to Natsionalnyi Bank Ukrainy’s head of external relations, Serhiy Kruhlik.

The hryvnia’s drop is rooted in “psychological and speculative factors” and authorities will leave “no stone unturned” in investigating possible currency speculation Yushchenko said in a statement on his Web site.

Yushchenko promised Ukraine would emerge from the crisis with a revived economy, saying March 25 the government has formed a “clear response.”

“Clearly the level of foreign currency depletion is politically highly sensitive, and there’s an idea that speculators have ripped them off,” said Tim Ash, head of emerging-market economics in London at Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc.

‘Bloodbath’

Moscow-based Prosperity Capital Management, which oversees $1.9 billion in former Soviet assets, has been selling Ukrainian equities. Its fund managers have been unable to get money out of the country because banks are unwilling to lose dollars from their stockpiles by converting hryvnia-denominated proceeds, said Ivan Mazalov, a Prosperity director.

“It’s a bloodbath,” he said.

Ukraine’s central bank has taken control of 11 local lenders since requesting the IMF loan. The Washington-based fund estimates the country will need to spend about 4.5 percent of its GDP to recapitalize the banking sector.

The yield on 4.95 percent euro-denominated Ukraine government bonds due 2015 doubled to 24 percent in the past six months. Russian dollar-bonds due 2018 yield just 6.61 percent.

Credit-default swaps insuring Ukrainian government debt are the most expensive in emerging Europe, according to prices from CMA Datavision in London. They cost 60.5 percent of the amount covered upfront and 5 percent a year. That means investors must pay $6.1 million in advance and $500,000 a year to protect $10 million in bonds for five years. Six months ago, that same protection cost $567,000 a year and nothing upfront.

‘Outright Taxation’

Yaroslav Lissovolik, chief economist in Moscow at Deutsche Bank AG, said Ukraine may impose “outright taxation on withdrawals leaving the country” or require exporters to sell some or all of their foreign-currency earnings to the central bank at rates it dictates.

In Kazakhstan, the government is preparing to block foreign currency from leaving. The Majilis, the lower house of parliament, has twice given preliminary approval to a measure that would let President Nursultan Nazarbayev compel exporters to sell foreign-exchange earnings to the government for tenge.

Kazakhstan’s exporters include Irving, Texas-based Exxon Mobil Corp, the world’s biggest oil company; Courbevoie, France- based Total SA, Europe’s third-largest oil group; and San Ramon, California-based Chevron Corp, the second-biggest U.S. oil producer.

‘Painful’ Possibility

Those companies wouldn’t be able to pay dividends to international shareholders or repatriate profits under this type of capital control, said Tatiana Orlova, an economist in Moscow at ING Groep NV. “It would be painful,” she said.

The Kazakh bill, which needs Senate approval before the president considers it, would also ban companies and citizens from making foreign-currency transfers overseas.

National Bank of Kazakhstan allowed the tenge to weaken 21 percent versus the dollar on Feb. 4 after Russia let the ruble depreciate 36 percent in the previous six months as oil prices fell 67 percent. Oil is the largest export earner for both Russia and Kazakhstan.

The tenge will be held at 150 per dollar for the rest of the year, central bank Governor Grigori Marchenko said on Feb. 18 and again a month later.

The Almaty-based central bank didn’t respond yesterday to questions e-mailed to spokeswoman Aigul Amankulova.

Economic Contraction

Kazakhstan, which holds 3.2 percent of the world’s oil reserves according to BP Plc, is facing its first contraction in economic growth in a decade as the government vows to spend as much as $4 billion bailing out banks. The state is the majority shareholder in BTA Bank, the country’s biggest lender, and may take a 76 percent share of Alliance Bank, the fourth-largest, said Margulan Seisembayev, its chairman, on March 2.

Credit-default swaps for Kazakhstan government debt have more than tripled to 1,114 basis points, or 11.14 percent of the amount covered, in the past six months, making them the second most expensive in the ex-Soviet and eastern European region. It costs $1.1 million a year to protect $10 million in debt from default each year for five years.

To contact the reporter on this story: Emma O’Brien in Moscow at eobrien6@bloomberg.net

Leave a reply

Name *

Mail *

Website